|
What follows is an edited version of a talk delivered on July 12, 2014, at the annual CFAR Conference. The theme this year was: ”Sexuality: Phantasy, Discourse and Practice”. I participated in a panel on the general subject of ”Sexuality and Phantasy”. My presentation was not prepared beforehand. This here is an edited transcription of a recording. As such, it tries, but fails in many ways, to capture the spontaneity and informality of what was said. But then, that’s the best I could do.
There you go. Good morning. I was wondering how to start today. I was considering the title of the panel, ”Sexuality and Phantasy”, and struggled to think. What, if anything, could I add to the subject? I realised this. I realised that whenever I find myself thinking about Sexuality, I find myself thinking of Descartes --you know, René Descartes, the philosopher. Of course Descartes did not, as far as I know, write about sexuality as such --or about phantasy for that matter. But he did write about the mind-body problem. This will be my starting point today.
ο»Ώ This is a slightly edited transcription of a talk I delivered on April 5, 2014, at the ”Workshop in preparation of the WAP Congress” of the London Society of the NLS. The theme of the congress is " A Real for the 21st Century ". The Workshop, organised by Janet Haney, was structured around four entries from the upcoming English version of Scilicet . Each was presented by a member or friend of the London Society who participated in the process of translation and editing. My talk was in connection to ”Shoah”, a paper by French psychoanalyst Philippe Benichou ο»Ώ .
Dear friends and colleagues, Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak today here about some of the questions I found myself struggling with, while reading and translating ”Shoah” by Philippe Benichou. Benichou’s paper talks about the Shoah. You cannot wonder , Benichou writes, what a "real for the twenty-first century" could be, without mentioning that event beyond meaning, real, all too real, the Shoah. I was captivated but also puzzled by the power of this depiction of the Shoah as an ”event beyond meaning, real, all too real”. I asked myself, what could this mean? Attempting to formulate an answer, I found myself faced with further questions: What is an event? What is history? What is a historical event? And then: What is real in a historical event? This is how I will begin. |
Archives
|